One of my fond memories growing up as a kid is of a Mini Moke that my Dad bought…. in jars…. someone had pulled apart a Moke with the intent to clean it all up and rebuild it, but lost interest after the pulling apart stage. I seem to recall that we did not pay a lot of money for it, but the experience of ‘helping’ (not sure I actually helped all that much) putting it back together was gold. (Along with learning how to drive it in the sand dunes out the back of our house).
So, with the last few posts on BB and my love of Mokes explained, I present this timely article of electric Mokes.
I love the look of the big one. What a cracker. Very Martty-esk.
My takeaway is described toward the bottom of this article…. we need a street legal fun EV.
With weather like we have in Southern California, an electric Moke would be perfect.
Driverless car makers are discovering a unique problem as they begin to test the vehicles in Australia.
It turns out the unusual way that kangaroos move completely throws off the car’s animal detection system.
“We’ve noticed with the kangaroo being in mid-flight … when it’s in the air it actually looks like it’s further away, then it lands and it looks closer,” Volvo Australia’s technical manager David Pickett said.
Because the cars use the ground as a reference point, they become confused by a hopping kangaroo, unable to determine how far away it is.
But Mr Pickett said it was even more complicated than that.
“First we have to start identifying the roo,” he said.
“We identify what a human looks like by how a human walks, because it’s not only the one type of human — you’ve got short people, tall people, people wearing coats. The same applies to a roo.
“If you look at a roo sitting at the side of a road, standing at the side of a road, in motion, all these shapes are actually different.”
The company nailed down their large animal detection software, first tested on moose in Sweden. But the research team, who were sent to Tidbinbilla Nature Reserve in Canberra 18 months ago to study roos, are still solving the Australian problem.
“It’s quite interesting for them,” Mr Pickett said.
Sorry for the long block quote, but it was too well written (goodonya ABC) to ignore.
Just fascinating how much this software has to take into account.
I guess what we are going to end up with is country (region?) specific software versions. I mean there is no point in having kangaroo code running in a Swedish car, right? And same in Australia, why would you need moose code floating around in your cars firmware….? When was the last time any of you Aussie readers had to swerve to miss a moose?
It boggles (my) the mind to think about all this code running in real time driving a car down the road. I just hope that I get to experience it at some stage in my life, but sadly, I think it is going to be out of my reach…. Just like an electric car (that said, saw a pretty sweet little electric Smart Car that was in my price range, but only if I sold Martty). But hey, that does not stop me blogging about it.
Is it obvious to you that this shot has not been taken with the drone?
Why? (Either way).
I could be standing just out of the frame with the remote. (I’m not. Mostly because I am not confident enough to be walking around while the drone is in the air – I tend to be froze on the spot focused on the job of flying).
No, for me, the dead giveaway that this is not a drone shot is the quality. The drone just can not give such a sharp saturated image.
Anyway, the real reason for this shot from my camera is because of the beautiful golden tones of the desert and the hint of the road.
I pretty much built Martty for this road (and Palomar).
Got to go for a drive a few weeks back.
Got to fly at sunrise.
Drove all over the place, but this was taken at Borrego Springs.
It’s the rule that you can’t fly and not take a dronie.
Flying the Phantom 3 Pro (the one I bought off Benson).
It is my only photo drone at the moment, I am still working on getting the others to fly and then get a camera mounted, so they are a little ways off yet.
Events have conspired to push us back into flying radio control aircraft. Specifically, drones, multirotor or quadcopters… They all the same thing, but people call them different names. Here is a quick recap of how this all came about.
We shoot video case studies at work to highlight how companies use our gear to automate a process. It’s good for them and it’s good for us, it helps their future customers understand how that company can help them, and it helps our future customers hear and see how others have used our gear.
So, a few weeks back, we had a case study video shoot to do in Northern California, cold storage of fruit.
At first, the boss said that he would be flying the drone… It is after all, HIS drone. He has flown it a few times and he also doubles as the director for the film crew, so it makes sense for him to be there.
Events built to the point where he was not going to be able to make it, so that left me to pick up the drone (I also do camera B and audio duties).
Long story short, I had around 3 days to learn how to set it up and fly it.
Phantom 3 Pro Drones
The DJI Phantom 3 Professional is no longer their top of the line drone, but it is still a lot of drone. Costing something north of 1500 bucks, it is also out of my price range.
The really interesting thing for me is that flying the thing is as much about the software as it is about flying.
The system uses a tablet, in this case an iPad something (Sorry, I don’t know anything about Apple products – it just works with the drone is all I know), it gets the feed from the remote. Both video and data show up. Both are required to fly the drone.
I was not going to learn how to fly on the job, so we did a few quick flights the Sunday before we left.
Rusty, but the drone has GPS, altitude lock and active stabilization electronics to help. The thing that really weirds me out is that you pretty much fly it from the video feed 99% of the time. Only during takeoff and landing do I look it (and even then I’m sure there are guys that do the whole thing from the video feed).
This is very different to how I have flown fix wing stuff in the past!
We also had to brush up on old skills like propeller balancing.
To say I was nervous is a MASSIVE understatement.
If we get some time, I plan to rough edit some of the video shots we got and share them here.
Here is a photo that our video guy got of me, I had no idea that he took this photo.
Here is one that I took of me from the drone.
At this point, I am flying inside the massive cool room that they store grapes in.
Nano practice drone
The good news is two fold. Firstly, I did not crash. Secondly, I get to do more flying latter this week at another video case study.
In the middle of the two weeks Freddy and Terry asked me what I wanted for a Father’s day present (apparently I am hard to buy presents for… and my name is not even Gary…).
The answer was pretty simple…. I needed a small practice drone.
So. There we are.
I am flying for work and pleasure.
Right now the FAA are between rules, so we are looking at whats required to keep this up moving forward.
At the moment it is still the bosses drone. Not sure whats going to happen there as he has been using it less and less (that was happening long before this shoot – just to be clear). It’s the sort of thing that if you don’t keep it up, you get rusty…. As I can attest to.
You might read or hear more about drones moving forward. Radio control aircraft seem to be making a comeback into my life. Amazing how stuff like this works out.